On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 17:59 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Sa, den 25.06.2005 schrieb ha haha um 17:16: > > > The 1.4.2 tree and 1.5 tree difference is something > > like difference 2.4 kernel tree and 2.6 kernel tree, > > both kernel trees are well maintained. But when you > > have a chance to install a new machine, would you > > prefer 2.4 kernel over 2.6? either for security or for > > features or for performance or for easy maintenance? > > Your cited yourself the FC4 release notes recommendation: > > "Sun Java 1.5+ is recommended for stability purposes." > > So what's your point? > > > > I don't really understand what confuses you. You may > > > review Sun's page > > > and the jpackage.org page (non-free section!). > > > > > > > I want a FREE version, best open-sources if possible, > > of everything on FC4 Linux. > > Sun's Java isn't free - period. Then live with the Java FC4 ships with > in Core. What about the java distro from IBM? Is that one open-source? Well, anyway I think a JVM is unnecessary overhead!! I would prefer native code; so maybe I should stick with FC4's java distro. Now is FC4's java distro basically GCJ (from the GNU Compiler Collection)? > > > Offering an old free demonstration version to allure > > users to pay for non-free version can not touch me at > > all, if this is the case. > > What is the "old free demonstration version" you speak about? Where do > you have to "pay" for a non-free version? > > Alexander > > P.S. It would be nice to speak to someone with a real name. > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
