I have 2 separate instances of the Satellite providers required software(proxy client) running on the FC2 box. 1 is assigned to the 192.168.1.0/24 and the other to the 192.168.100.0/24 network. DHCP is assigning the correct gateways and the clients can communicate without going thru the proxy. The problem is exactly as you stated- I need the FC2 box to route requests from 192.168.1.0/24 thru eth0 and requests from 192.168.100.0/24 thru eth1 exclusively. This will separate the 2 networks to be independent of each other. If I setup a route for 1 interface the other will not communicate and vice versa. Is there any way to allow each network to communicate via their respective interface without interacting with the other interface. Thanks > Kevin Plew wrote: >> The FC2 box is not acting as a router. I don't want all packets to go >> through eth0 due to the load on the wireless router. The reason I want >> to >> route through the 2 interfaces is to reduce the total load on each >> router. > > Right, I see. So the FC2 server is just a file/print/DNS/DHCP etc. server? > > So clients of 192.168.1.0/24 should be using 192.168.1.1 as their > router/gateway and clients of 192.168.100.0/24 should be using > 192.168.100.1 as their router/gateway. Since both of your wireless > routers have interfaces on the 10.x.x.x network, they should be able to > reach 10.10.11.50 without any additional routes. The only additional > route entry you need is one via either eth0 or eth1 for the FC2 server > itself. They key would seem to be to set up the DHCP server to assign > the correct router to each network's clients. > > Paul. > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
