Re: FC3 - i'm disapointed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



bdw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

As far as the kernel goes, I always build a custom kernel that matches my
system.  I would get a copy of 2.6.10 and build a kernel that matches your
system.  I've not experienced any problems with the USB subsystem.

I haven't had any problems with OpenOffice.  It's up to 1.1.13 at this
time and it could fix a potential memory leak.

--Brian



Hey guys,
I have to post it.

I have been using RH from RH 7.0
And was pretty happy with.

Then moved on to FC1 then FC2.... and now FC3.

I hate to admit it but FC3 is really broken in general.
I do not want to start a new flame thread but here is a several items i
can assume lot's of them has to do with kernel 2.6:
	- usb drivers - not stable
	- network - same
	- some applications compiled on the system - crashes
	- certain kernel updates - make system not bootable
	- Open Office tend to load memory to the point that machine need to be
rebooted
	and list grows on a daily basis which is really reminds me a windowZ
and nothing close what it was in FC1  on the same hardware for example.

I understand that this is probably inappropriate post, but i have been
in pain since I moved to FC3.

Does any one else experience as many problems as i do?

Sincerely,
Kiryl


-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list







Kiryl,

Could you add a short rundown of the hardware you are running? i've been a RH user on and off since 6.2 and wow, FC3 has jacked my box up so much, i downloaded Debian stable last night for a testing install.

Anyway, if your hardware is similar to mine and some others, i may just wait it out. i like Fedora - don't really want to switch at all.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux