Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
• From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:59:29 -0500 (EST)
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS]

Timothy Ha said:

> I could not connect from FC2 to a Windows box with RealVNC on it.

Works for me.  Perhaps you can open your on thread with some details so we
can try to help you.

-- 
William Hooper

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
    • From: kbwilliams

• References:
  • Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
    • From: Steve Bergman
  • Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
    • From: Timothy Ha

• Prev by Date: Re: Kernel Build Question.
• Next by Date: up2date not working?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
• Next by thread: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread