Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:59:29 -0500 (EST)
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS]

Timothy Ha said:

> I could not connect from FC2 to a Windows box with RealVNC on it.

Works for me.  Perhaps you can open your on thread with some details so we
can try to help you.

-- 
William Hooper

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: kbwilliams

References:
- Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: Steve Bergman
- Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: Timothy Ha

Prev by Date: Re: Kernel Build Question.
Next by Date: up2date not working?
Previous by thread: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
Next by thread: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux