Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?

• To: Fedora-List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
• From: Steve Bergman <steve@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:18:37 -0600
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm interested to know what the reasons were for switching from TightVNC
to RealVNC.  I know that earlier versions of RedHat/Fedora Linux used
TightVNC, but now RealVNC seems to have replaced it.

Understand, I'm not in disagreement with the change, but as I am
evaluating both for a project, I'm curious.

-Steve Bergman

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
    • From: Tim Waugh
  • Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
    • From: Timothy Ha

• Prev by Date: Re: [FC3] WHEEEE! Hey, yall- try this!
• Next by Date: Re: [Wine]For Red Hat 9.0 Any successfully running Wine Binary RPM (2004-12-01) ?
• Previous by thread: Re: [Wine]For Red Hat 9.0 Any successfully running Wine Binary RPM (2004-12-01) ?
• Next by thread: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread