Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Fedora-List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
From: Steve Bergman <steve@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:18:37 -0600
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm interested to know what the reasons were for switching from TightVNC
to RealVNC.  I know that earlier versions of RedHat/Fedora Linux used
TightVNC, but now RealVNC seems to have replaced it.

Understand, I'm not in disagreement with the change, but as I am
evaluating both for a project, I'm curious.

-Steve Bergman

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: Tim Waugh
- Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: Timothy Ha

Prev by Date: Re: [FC3] WHEEEE! Hey, yall- try this!
Next by Date: Re: [Wine]For Red Hat 9.0 Any successfully running Wine Binary RPM (2004-12-01) ?
Previous by thread: Re: [Wine]For Red Hat 9.0 Any successfully running Wine Binary RPM (2004-12-01) ?
Next by thread: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux