Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Is it because RealVNC is popular in Windows systems?

I could not connect from FC2 to a Windows box with RealVNC on it.


Steve Bergman wrote:

I'm interested to know what the reasons were for switching from TightVNC
to RealVNC.  I know that earlier versions of RedHat/Fedora Linux used
TightVNC, but now RealVNC seems to have replaced it.

Understand, I'm not in disagreement with the change, but as I am
evaluating both for a project, I'm curious.

-Steve Bergman

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux