On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 05:54:43 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers <dag@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Implying that I'm not willing to work together (what you've done > > repeatedly now) is not really nice though. > > I have not meant imply that you are unwilling to contribute under any > circumstances. I'm sure if Fedora Extra's initial policy was exactly > what you wanted you would contribute. What I am concerned about is > trying to find out exactly under which conditions you are and are not > willing to contribute. What would be blocking issues and what are > issues that you can compromise over initially and work towards > resolution inside the contributor process. I thought I've been pretty clear about that. What's missing is information about Fedora Extras to put the pieces together. > From where I stand I'm not sure Fedora Extras as its initial policy will > be laid out will be compatible with your personal desire to see a zero > overhead solution, and I'm not sure how much overhead you are willing to > put up with. If there is a failing here, its my personally failing to > understand with accuracy the tenancy of your desire to be invovled. Fair enough. It seems you have some inside information that I don't to draw such conclusions. I'll simply have to wait (proceed with what we're doing) and see. -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
