On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 23:20, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > John Burton wrote: > > The original poster mentioned he was on a dialup line, which > > implies dynamic IP addresses. > > No. He explicitly said he has static IP address, and that this IP > address is often incorrectly listed as dial-up address. That is the > only piece of information present in his original posting. Assuming that his original post comes from the same IP he's talking about, this seems like an either wrong information or unlucky/stupid case. Seems that all IPs around him are dial-up IPs of his ISP, chello.at. And chello.at seems not to be liked by BLs, probably because they have outgoing SMTP open and hence nurture spammers. I'd conclude that in a first instance it would be up to chello.at to do something about their reputation they've earned in the net! (I'm connected through an ISP which was not long ago one of the most notorious one rgd causing spam traffic, especially because of their ignorance rgd abusing customers. But since BLs have gone a hard line against this ISP, the people in charge quickly realized that they had to change if they wanted to stay alive. They've blocked outgoing SMTP, closed their mail-relays,... Shortly after, the BLs started removing the ISP and since then I have no more trouble sending mail -- except the fact that their mail server imposes a 2MB limit/mail on me). So again, find the root cause & solve it or you'll be fighting an up-hill battle for long... -- HaJo Schatz <hajo@xxxxxxxx> http://www.HaJo.Net PGP-Key: http://www.hajo.net/hajonet/keys/pgpkey_hajo.txt
