Re: Fedora Extras is extra

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fedora Extras is extra
From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:16:45 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 20:37 -0600, Jeff Vian wrote:

> And one of the statements about Fedora Extras is:
> "Packages in Fedora Extras must not conflict with packages in Fedora
> Core."
> 
> Fedora.US has some packages that do not meet this requirement.
Which? This would qualify them as broken.

Ralf

References:
- Fedora Extras is extra
  - From: William M. Quarles
- Re: Fedora Extras is extra
  - From: Matthew Miller
- Re: Fedora Extras is extra
  - From: Chris Stark
- Re: Fedora Extras is extra
  - From: Matthew Miller
- Re: Fedora Extras is extra
  - From: William M. Quarles
- Re: Fedora Extras is extra
  - From: William M. Quarles
- Re: Fedora Extras is extra
  - From: Bernd Radinger
- Re: Fedora Extras is extra
  - From: Jeff Vian

Prev by Date: Re: Fedora Extras is extra
Next by Date: OT: fighting rbl's
Previous by thread: Re: Fedora Extras is extra
Next by thread: Re: Fedora Extras is extra
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]