On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:19:53PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > >Thanks for the help, I'm not sure "why" that is different from what I > >did, but it works. Thanks. > > > >On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 02:16, Paul Howarth wrote: > >>I have an FC2 ntp server, configured as follows: > >> > >>restrict default ignore > >>restrict 127.0.0.1 > >>restrict 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 nomodify notrap > >>... > >> > >>(my clients are on 192.168.2.0/24). > >> > >>It's the "notrust" that seems to break acting as a server. > > It turns out that the developers of ntpd, for reasons best known to > themselves, have changed the meaning of the keyword "notrust". The result > is that it's no longer appropriate for use in the lines pertaining to > regular clients in the ntp.conf file. I have attached a patch to Bug 127150 > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127150) to address > this. > > This bug was previous marked CLOSED NOTABUG; does anyone know if adding a > patch will cause this bug to be reopened, or should I start a new bug? I see the status now is: fixed in ntp-4.2.0.a.20040616-3 -- T o m M i t c h e l l Just say no to 74LS73 in 2004
