Thanks for the help, I'm not sure "why" that is different from what I did, but it works. Thanks.
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 02:16, Paul Howarth wrote:I have an FC2 ntp server, configured as follows:
restrict default ignore restrict 127.0.0.1 restrict 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 nomodify notrap ...
(my clients are on 192.168.2.0/24).
It's the "notrust" that seems to break acting as a server.
It turns out that the developers of ntpd, for reasons best known to themselves, have changed the meaning of the keyword "notrust". The result is that it's no longer appropriate for use in the lines pertaining to regular clients in the ntp.conf file. I have attached a patch to Bug 127150 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127150) to address this.
This bug was previous marked CLOSED NOTABUG; does anyone know if adding a patch will cause this bug to be reopened, or should I start a new bug?
Cheers, Paul.