On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:16:47 +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:20:03 +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote: > > > (@Michael) > > > There is a seperate package for gsx, called ghostscript-gtk, but > > > the only file in this package is gsx itself. I see no problem that > > > *this* package depends on gtk and gdk-pixbuf, but why ghostscript? > > > > Packaging bug? > > It seems so. I have just checked this on another machine (FC2) without > ghostscript-gtk installed, and there I have /usr/bin/gsx, too. > > > $ rpm -qlvp ghostscript-7.07-29.i386.rpm | grep gsx > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14468 Jun 25 18:44 > > /usr/bin/gsx $ rpm -qlvp ghostscript-gtk-7.07-29.i386.rpm | grep gsx > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14468 Jun 25 18:44 > > /usr/bin/gsx > > But why does this give no file conflict during the installation of > ghostscript-gtk? Because both packages contain exactly the same file with the same checksum. That is permitted.
