Re: up2date is still a nightmare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: up2date is still a nightmare
From: "Thomas Cameron" <thomas.cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:17:00 -0500
Cc:
References: <1092216751.4793.19.camel@littlePiet><2611.12.29.16.103.1092229883.squirrel@[12.29.16.103]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Timothy Murphy" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: up2date is still a nightmare


> William Hooper wrote:
>
> > 3) Use yum, since you seem to prefer it.  That doesn't mean up2date
should
> > be removed.
>
> I asked before, but I don't think I got an answer:
> What advantage(s) does up2date have over yum ?

Seems to me to be easier to use with really picky proxies (requiring
username/password pairs).

Thomas

References:
- up2date is still a nightmare
  - From: Peter Boy
- Re: up2date is still a nightmare
  - From: William Hooper
- Re: up2date is still a nightmare
  - From: Timothy Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: Unable to boot kernel on ANY Compaq system
Next by Date: Re: update vs yum update
Previous by thread: Re: up2date is still a nightmare
Next by thread: Re: up2date is still a nightmare
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]