Re: up2date is still a nightmare

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: up2date is still a nightmare
• From: Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:08:33 +0100
• Mail-copies-to: [email protected]
• Organization: Trinity College Dublin
• References: <1092216751.4793.19.camel@littlePiet> <2611.12.29.16.103.1092229883.squirrel@[12.29.16.103]>
• Reply-to: tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Sender: news <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KNode/0.7.7

William Hooper wrote:

> 3) Use yum, since you seem to prefer it.  That doesn't mean up2date should
> be removed.

I asked before, but I don't think I got an answer:
What advantage(s) does up2date have over yum ?

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: up2date is still a nightmare
    • From: Thomas Cameron
  • Re: up2date is still a nightmare
    • From: William Hooper

• References:
  • up2date is still a nightmare
    • From: Peter Boy
  • Re: up2date is still a nightmare
    • From: William Hooper

• Prev by Date: Authentication: NIS vs LDAP
• Next by Date: FC2 USB keyyboard and mouse via a KVM switch support
• Previous by thread: Re: up2date is still a nightmare
• Next by thread: Re: up2date is still a nightmare
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread