People and "machine". I know that spam is a major problem today, but constantly increasing the load on available bandwidth can hardly be a solution. Someone, please tell me that this fellow's autoresponder is an aberration and that we won't have to become slaves to the machines. Thanks, Dick On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 07:37, allit@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > The message you sent requires that you verify that you > are a real live human being and not a spam source. > > To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave > the subject line intact. > > The headers of the message sent from your address are show below: > > >From fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx Sun May 02 13:37:54 2004 > Received: from [209.132.177.30] (helo=hormel.redhat.com) > by ns.allit.be with esmtp (Exim 4.30) > id 1BKFI9-0003Z7-Nz > for fedora@xxxxxxxx; Sun, 02 May 2004 13:37:54 +0200 > Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.110]) > by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP > id AA8ED73C44; Sun, 2 May 2004 07:33:42 -0400 (EDT) > Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com > [172.16.52.254]) > by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id > i42BXcMo004806 for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Sun, 2 May 2004 07:33:38 -0400 > Received: (from mail@localhost) > by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i42BXco07813 > for fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > Sun, 2 May 2004 07:33:38 -0400 > Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) > by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i42BXbv07809 > for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 2 May 2004 07:33:38 -0400 > Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) > by mx3.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i42BXb99024636 > for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 2 May 2004 07:33:37 -0400 > Received: from [66.31.146.180] (raroth.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.31.146.180]) > by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP > id <2004050211333101300i1ooje>; Sun, 2 May 2004 11:33:31 +0000 > From: Dick Roth <raroth7@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > In-Reply-To: <4093435A.3080505@xxxxxxxxxxx> > References: <1083391537.3700.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > <4093435A.3080505@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > Message-Id: <1083497610.3738.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) > Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 07:33:30 -0400 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0 > X-loop: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Initial Problems with FC1 > X-BeenThere: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 > Precedence: junk > Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > List-Id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com> > List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, > <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe> > List-Archive: </archives/fedora-list> > List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > List-Help: <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=help> > List-Subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, > <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe> > Sender: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > Errors-To: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx -- In these trying times, Ben Franklin's view should be a guide: "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." (1759)
