Douglas Furlong wrote:
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 00:12, James Ralston wrote:
On 2004-04-04 at 10:54:14-04 William Hooper <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Arguably the most popular release was 7.3, and it's support wasn't
extended.
I would suspect Red Hat's reasoning was that people could still
upgrade to RHL9.
Just a small point, but as a purchaser of 10 RHN licences I got a email
several months ago, informing me of the EOL of RHL9, and due to the
purchase of the RHN licence I am entitled to the RHELWS product.
So any one that has payed for a RHL9 RHN subscription still has an
upgrade path.
Seems more then reasonable to me.
Doug
Make the call...
That opportunity was only until the end of Feb.
And now you get nothing.
Grrrr....
