On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 00:12, James Ralston wrote: > On 2004-04-04 at 10:54:14-04 William Hooper <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Arguably the most popular release was 7.3, and it's support wasn't > > extended. > > I would suspect Red Hat's reasoning was that people could still > upgrade to RHL9. Just a small point, but as a purchaser of 10 RHN licences I got a email several months ago, informing me of the EOL of RHL9, and due to the purchase of the RHN licence I am entitled to the RHELWS product. So any one that has payed for a RHL9 RHN subscription still has an upgrade path. Seems more then reasonable to me. Doug
