On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, T. Ribbrock wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:54:52PM -0500, Joe Klemmer wrote: > [...] > > FC1 is much more reliable and stable than RH8 ever dreamed it could > > be. And you must be forgetting about the 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, 6.x days > > as well. > > Huh? 4.2, 5.2 and 6.2 were excellent releases wrt stability - that's > exactly where the old "only use the x.2s from RH!" addage came from. 7.2 > was an exception but was improved on by 7.3 (which fits nicely into the > row above). agreed :) hence why I only just a couple months ago (stupidly) got rid of the 7.3 boxes. -- Regards, Res
