On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > And that's not even the kicker -- the kicker is that the alternative he's > using is *Slackware*. An even less appropriate product for the role in which > he's using it. how do you conclude that ? we have never had a problem with slackware servers, they have been as stable as the old RH ones. -- Regards, Res
