Preston Crawford said: > On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 08:48, David L Norris wrote: >> On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 15:50, Robin Laing wrote: >> > I like Fedora but I don't like that it doesn't follow the standards as >> > laid down by the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard >> > <http://www.pathname.com/fhs/index.html> >> >> How is Fedora violating FHS? It might be helpful to enumerate one or >> more deficiencies instead of just saying "Naughty naughty Fedora doesn't >> follow standards." >> >> I'd truly be interested to know because I don't see anything which >> obviously violates FHS. A cursory glance would suggest that FC1 is >> completely FHS 2.2 compliant. >> >> Also, LSB compliance in FC1 is provided by the redhat-lsb package. > > Same here. I've used other distros that are very LSB-compliant (SuSE) > and Fedora seems just as good from what I can see. > As for me, I'm happily running Fedora, actually an upgrade from RH9. Filesytem layout is identical to that of Redhat. Peter
