On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 08:48, David L Norris wrote: > On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 15:50, Robin Laing wrote: > > I like Fedora but I don't like that it doesn't follow the standards as > > laid down by the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard > > <http://www.pathname.com/fhs/index.html> > > How is Fedora violating FHS? It might be helpful to enumerate one or > more deficiencies instead of just saying "Naughty naughty Fedora doesn't > follow standards." > > I'd truly be interested to know because I don't see anything which > obviously violates FHS. A cursory glance would suggest that FC1 is > completely FHS 2.2 compliant. > > Also, LSB compliance in FC1 is provided by the redhat-lsb package. Same here. I've used other distros that are very LSB-compliant (SuSE) and Fedora seems just as good from what I can see. Preston
