On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 15:50, Robin Laing wrote: > I like Fedora but I don't like that it doesn't follow the standards as > laid down by the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard > <http://www.pathname.com/fhs/index.html> How is Fedora violating FHS? It might be helpful to enumerate one or more deficiencies instead of just saying "Naughty naughty Fedora doesn't follow standards." I'd truly be interested to know because I don't see anything which obviously violates FHS. A cursory glance would suggest that FC1 is completely FHS 2.2 compliant. Also, LSB compliance in FC1 is provided by the redhat-lsb package. -- David Norris http://www.webaugur.com/dave/ ICQ - 412039
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
