On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:18, Christopher Chan wrote: > > If it doesn't come with a license, then its even worse. According to > > most copyright laws in the world no one but the author has an authorized > > copy. Obviously, you missed something. > > Heh. No I haven't. > > I don't a license to own a book. Neither do I need a license to own a > copy of a piece of software under any copyright law. Ok. First you forget that the book is the implicit licensed copy. Then you forget that software is normally distributed by law with a license, unless it is public domain. > Here's is my strong feelings to use tinydns over bind. I did not advocate bind, necessarily. There's other programs, like Mara. I refrain from commenting Mara, since I don't know it, and my usage of bind is rather minimal and we like to keep it under controlled environments, because of its (in)security track. > The tinydns program has a small memory footprint, has no history of > security holes whatsoever, is easy to configure and maintain, is fast > and has the minor benefit of requiring no restart of the program when > the dns configuration is updated. No one said Dan's an incompetent coder, much by the contrary. What he is is so anti-social that it is even reflected upon the way he automatically treats people he doesn't know, through his license. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
