Re: Bind v. TinyDNS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am So, den 04.01.2004 schrieb WipeOut um 15:50:
> Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> 
> >On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 13:20, WipeOut wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>IIRC, his licence says that you can't re-distribute binary versions of 
> >>his software but it can be re-distributed as source..
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >DJB's license only allows pristine redistribution.
> >
> >He considers the distribution of patches as somethings separate.
> >
> >Everyone having to maintain a complex qmail MTA at an ISP usually has to
> >patch qmail with SEVERAL patches that _are_not_ going to ever be
> >integrated, easing most everyone's life.
> >
> >Every time there an update on one patch, those admins suffer real pains
> >that could have been avoided if but Dan's arrogance allowed it.
> >
> >Rui
> >
> >  
> >
> This I have to agree with.. keeping track of patches is a nightmare.. It 
> would be nice to have an up to date version..
> 
> Later..

http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html

A lot of reasons to take any other MTA and to kick qmail in the desert.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany
PGP key valid: made 13.07.1999
PGP fingerprint: 2307 88FD 2D41 038E 7416  14CD E197 6E88 ED69 5653




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux