Buck wrote: > I agree. The need or desire dictates the product used. For me, SuSE is > more affordable, has long term maintenance and an option for a long term take note: "At the moment_ we are maintaining SuSE Linux for 2 years - that means Bug fixes and Security fixes will be released for two years for each SuSE Linux version. Contrary to our business products with maintenance this is _not_ guaranteed." > stable product compatible with the rest. For $50 ($10 less than the Red $40 SuSE Linux 8.2 Personal is very castrated. http://www.suse.com/us/private/products/suse_linux/i386/pers_prof.html Red Hat Linux is cheaper, free. And you are able to get all *ISO* images from NET. > Hat Network) I get an original disc, I can copy and distribute it for ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > free, and I can install it on all the computers I desire. If, on the ^^^^ http://www.suse.com/us/private/support/licenses/yast.html Are you sure of this?. With RH Linux you are free to install it wherever you want. And Modify and sell it under your _own_ name(without rh logos....) -- :x
