On Oct 2, 2003, Michael Schwendt <ms-nospam-0306@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 18:02:20 -0400, Buck wrote: >> Cc: <dh@xxxxxxxx>, >> "'Benjamin J. Weiss'" <benjamin@xxxxxxxxxx>, >> "'Alexandre Oliva'" <aoliva@xxxxxxxxxx> > Is this necessary? > Do these people appreciate getting carbon copies of mails which don't > even reply to what they have written? FWIW, I don't really care. My mailer will delete duplicates, and downloading one more copy of the message is no big deal as long as it's not huge. In fact, I like being Cc:ed when my attention is asked for (e.g., when I took part in a discussion) because my mailer is configured to highlight messages that have my e-mail address in To: or Cc:. As for Reply-To:, I've configured this group in Gnus with (broken-reply-to . t), such that reply goes to the author, and follow-up goes to everybody, as intended. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer