Eric J. Feldhusen wrote:
Example,
A computer with 4 - 100GB hard drives in a RAID 1 (mirroring), set up a mirror with 2 hot spares. Total storage - 100GB, but you can have 3 drive failures and the system can keep running.
In the event of two drive failures close together (second goes while rebuilding ), isn't there a small window of time that you'd only need to lose two to suffer complete data loss? Would it be better to have 3 active with one hot spare?
A computer with 4 - 100GB hard drives in a RAID 5 (parity) set up, 3 drives are active in the RAID 5, 1 hot spare drive, Total storage 200GB, actually a little less due to overhead. In this configuration, one of the drives in the raid fails, the hot spare becomes active, the raid rebuilds, and you replace the dead drive with a fresh drive and this drive becomes the hot spare. In this case, you can have 2 drives fail and the system can keep going.
Same deal as above, what happens if a second drive fails during rebuild?
-- Scott Burns Mirrabooka Systems
Tel +61 7 3857 7899
Fax +61 7 3857 1368
