> -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mike Klinke > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:33 AM > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Fedora Update Notification: Mozilla [1.4.1-18] > > > Given a choice between taking the time to evaluate a new revision with > new features/enhancements and simply fixing a bug that keeps Mozilla > from seg faulting depending on your google hits I'm pretty sure which > I'd choose. In fact, I don't see why these need to be thought of as > mutually exclusive testing activities. Thanks for the update folks! > > Regards, Mike Klinke Good point Mike... that would be great if up2date could handle Mozilla 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 and a user could choose which version they want to "track". Is it just a matter of the hours required to put rpms together? Since Fedora is "For the people, by the people", what is the process to volunteer to do this sort of thing? Don
