On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 00:03, Grizzly(Francis Smit) wrote: > Steven W. Orr wrote: > > >I think that *29* lines of a .siganture file is about as rude as I've ever > >seen it. Please read http://www.foggy.co.uk/acornfaq/netiq.html > >especially the section on Signatures. > > > > > > > hmmm clearly you are a person who is seriously challenged in the area of > good manners, > contacting people of list and berating them about their sig/netiquette, > is in and of it's self > rude, but since this is a list and policy about posts/sigs etc should be > either the decision of > the entire list, or the list owner/admins, that makes it doubly rude. > I cannot help feeling that deep down you knew you where being rude, why > else do this > off list, how ever I am bringing this back on list where everyone may > have their say about > this if they even care. In the spirit of debate I have temporarily > shortened my sig for this > post, however I'd like to see a valid argument as to why there is a > problem with sig length, > something you have completely neglected, a link to a (hmm ISP I > think)'s netiquette page > is not a valid anything, as that is just their opinion, and unless they > are a member of this > forum their opinion is irrelevant. > FWIW I have a few pet peeves regarding list usage: Long signatures, or signatures in general for that matter that require me to delete them when I reply. Top posting. I used the archives of lists as a primary information resource. if a message thread is too jumbled the information is lost. thread hijacking. Html mail. Bret
