Steven W. Orr wrote:
I think that *29* lines of a .siganture file is about as rude as I've ever seen it. Please read http://www.foggy.co.uk/acornfaq/netiq.htmlhmmm clearly you are a person who is seriously challenged in the area of good manners,
especially the section on Signatures.
contacting people of list and berating them about their sig/netiquette, is in and of it's self
rude, but since this is a list and policy about posts/sigs etc should be either the decision of
the entire list, or the list owner/admins, that makes it doubly rude. I cannot help feeling that deep down you knew you where being rude, why else do this
off list, how ever I am bringing this back on list where everyone may have their say about
this if they even care. In the spirit of debate I have temporarily shortened my sig for this
post, however I'd like to see a valid argument as to why there is a problem with sig length,
something you have completely neglected, a link to a (hmm ISP I think)'s netiquette page
is not a valid anything, as that is just their opinion, and unless they are a member of this
forum their opinion is irrelevant.
--
<pre> ------------- ------------------------------------------- ---------- .-. ----------------------------------------- --------- /V\ ----------- Grizzly . oo ------------- --------- // \\ -------------- `oO ------------- ---------- /( )\ ----------------------------------------- ------------ ^^-^^ ------------------------------------------- Francis Smit ------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------- </pre>
___________________________________