Well I have gotten XP to run on 32megs, slowly but it runs I have also gotten RH9.0 to run on the same 32 megs minus gui --- WipeOut <wipe_out@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Steve Watford wrote: > > >They are running IE something. They are on SP 6. > Although they are slow and the > > graphics are limited. 800x600 16 color I think. > They work. FC1 refuses to try > >to install, anaconda just exits. RH9 did install, > although it won't run X > >without swapping to disk so much that the HD starts > throwing timeout errors. > >Guess I'm just going to have upgrade the ram. > Funny that for linux we need to > >upgrade the hardware that WinNT will run on. Sort > of a reversal. I know there > >are lighter versions of linux out there, but we > have settled on RH,Fedora. > > > >Thanks > > > > > > > Your comparison is a little skewed, you are > comparing the latest Linux > system with a prehistoric windows version.. > If you want to compare to WinNT you should be trying > to install RH5.x. > If you are comparing to FC1 then you need to use > Windows 2003.. > > I don't think Windows 2003 would be too happy on > 32MB of RAM either.. ;-) > > Later.. > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/
