Re: RH 9.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RH 9.0
From: "gm" <novastars@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:51:20 -0500
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

> I have been considering going back to RH 9.0 since Fedora is too
> volatile to work with.
> Is there any technical problems with 9.0 that I need to be aware of?

I found rh 9.0 works nice and i've been running it for about 6 months with
no problems to speak of.


cheers


gm

References:
- 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: Richard Duncan
- Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: Scott Burns
- Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: Xose Vazquez Perez
- Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: David C. Hart
- Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: John Burricelli - KC2KZZ
- Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: Michael Kearey
- Re: RH 9.0
  - From: Chris Sparks
- Re: RH 9.0
  - From: William Hooper

Prev by Date: RE: IMAP vs Pop3
Next by Date: Re: Mouse (I'm stupid)
Previous by thread: Re: RH 9.0
Next by thread: Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]