Re: RH 9.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RH 9.0
From: Chris Sparks <mrada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:50:23 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Hi everyone,

I have been considering going back to RH 9.0 since Fedora is too volatile to work with. Is there any technical problems with 9.0 that I need to be aware of?

Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RH 9.0
  - From: William Hooper

References:
- 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: Richard Duncan
- Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: Scott Burns
- Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: Xose Vazquez Perez
- Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: David C. Hart
- Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: John Burricelli - KC2KZZ
- Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
  - From: Michael Kearey

Prev by Date: WMV in totem
Next by Date: Re: [OT] DVD audio ripper?
Previous by thread: Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
Next by thread: Re: RH 9.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]