Re: RH 9.0

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: RH 9.0
• From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:25:25 -0500 (EST)
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 [CVS]

Chris Sparks  said:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been considering going back to RH 9.0 since Fedora is too
> volatile to work with.
> Is there any technical problems with 9.0 that I need to be aware of?

Please join the Red Hat 9 "Shrike" list for RH 9 questions:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

-- 
William Hooper

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RH 9.0
    • From: gm

• References:
  • 2.6 final available, any takers?
    • From: Richard Duncan
  • Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
    • From: Scott Burns
  • Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
    • From: Xose Vazquez Perez
  • Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
    • From: David C. Hart
  • Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
    • From: John Burricelli - KC2KZZ
  • Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
    • From: Michael Kearey
  • Re: RH 9.0
    • From: Chris Sparks

• Prev by Date: Re: Newbie: How to upgrade from Red Hat 9 to Fedora from hard disk
• Next by Date: RE: Suggestions on One-Time Mailing
• Previous by thread: Re: RH 9.0
• Next by thread: Re: RH 9.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread