On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 14:45, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > Removing or omitting the ability to mark sent messages with higher or lower > priority is NOT a good thing. It removes choice, which you so fervently > espouse. Having that choice does not force anything upon the recipient. > Evolution is going to lose points with most corporate users, and many other > folks, for not having this. Why-oh-why would this become an issue of rights > and choice? Good grief! This is better suited in the evolution mailing lists, specially if accompanied with code or a bounty. You can also make a subject like: [URGENT] about my retirement plan... Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
