On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 14:28, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 11:16, Jack Aboutboul wrote: > > > > 1) The ability to define the priority of my messages. In other mailers, > > > I can select to send a message (if urgent) with *high* > > > priority, instead of the default. > > > > Agreed. > > This flag is ignored by most mailers, for good reason; it's trivially > easy for spammers to abuse it. So how is it that kmail, netscape, mozilla, and other mailers which I've used in the past *don't* ASSume that I will use the software to spam people? My need to change priority has a reason and a logic. For example, on another list, I wanted to reply to someone off-list, *urgently*. The recipient needed some linux CD's to install on his system in and was asking for a loan of a set. He was also travelling back and forth in and out of town, so naturally in that case, I would require / wish to reply to him *urgently*. However, replying via Evolution, I was not afforded that "luxury"! LOL! Elton ;-) -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_4504.html "You only live once: let's make life BETTER for each other." LINUX User #193975 [AMD ATHLON CPU] ICQ #149608718.Public
