On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 16:02, Elton Woo wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 14:28, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 11:16, Jack Aboutboul wrote: > > > > > > 1) The ability to define the priority of my messages. In other mailers, > > > > I can select to send a message (if urgent) with *high* > > > > priority, instead of the default. > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > This flag is ignored by most mailers, for good reason; it's trivially > > easy for spammers to abuse it. > So how is it that kmail, netscape, mozilla, and other mailers which > I've used in the past *don't* ASSume that I will use the software to > spam people? > > My need to change priority has a reason and a logic. > > For example, on another list, I wanted to reply to someone off-list, > *urgently*. The recipient needed some linux CD's to install on his > system in and was asking for a loan of a set. He was also travelling > back and forth in and out of town, so naturally in that case, I would > require / wish to reply to him *urgently*. > > However, replying via Evolution, I was not afforded that "luxury"! I don't know why Ximian developers are reluctant to enable sending messages with a priority flag, but I do know that I usually ignore the flag. It maybe important to the sender, but not to me. Evolution lets me flag a message as high priority when it is important to me. The example you cited, if it was important to the recipient, then it doesn't matter if you flagged it or not. They will make it a priority. If you still feel that you need this ability, then I would strongly urge you to take this to the Ximian Evolution list. -- Clifford Snow
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
