Hi Elton: >IMHO, I think you are missing the point. LINUX is a multi-user system. >Hence allowing users to install things goes against the security of >linux. ... >from a GUI interface, which first prompts for the root password, >*of course*. I'm not a programmer, but I would think it is feasable. OF COURSE!. My be I explained bad. An example to make it more clear. After a lot of time I convinced my wife to put only Linux in her computer at home ( all others home computers that we have were migrated to Linux at least one year ago ;) ). She is not computer intensive user. Only web, mail, irc, ... kazaa :/ ... whatch video and instant messaging. She has Fedora Core with synaptic but she goes to www.softonic.com ( as usually she made under Windoze ) and say: Woa! amsn is exactly like MS Messenger, and do all things that I could made with MS Messenger and can't do with gaim!. I NEED IT ( Try to say to your wife that she doesn't need the thing that she says ). She goes to the amsn homepage and see: After 5th October Microsoft changed msn protocol. The new amsn version 0.83 support this new protocol, to be able to talk with other msn users, download and install 0.83 version ( the link points to amsn.0.83.tar.gz ). Version numbers or files are not accurated, but get the idea. Well, she can 'su -' and tar xzvf app.tar.gz 'cause she uses normal user account but is HER computer and need to use it ( and this include install new applications ) but... Wait! configure claims that lib.something.0.34.so is missing and tk>=4.6 is needed ( some of this can be solved installing some app-devel packages and others need to be downloaded entirely from the net). But she is law specialist, not sysadmin, then she calls me and I know how to solve this deps, and ALWAYS is the same. Run configure, see what fails ( in 99,9% are devel packages, new packages or upgraded versions of other applications ), solve deps and run make, make install. The problem is that the new installed app ( or upgraded ) is missing in the local application repository ( rpm database ). I'm thinking on something like a 'apt/synaptic' with support for tar.gz, to TRY to install applications where deps are 'evidents/mechanics' and not need a lot of effort to solve. I hope this time I explained better the idea Regards David Ballester Montolio Responsable de Sistemas y Comunicaciones Kern Pharma, S.L. www.kernpharma.com GNU! |---------+------------------------------> | | Elton Woo | | | <elwoo@xxxxxxxxxxxx| | | > | | | Enviado por: | | | fedora-list-admin@r| | | edhat.com | | | | | | | | | 15/12/2003 19:52 | | | Por favor, responda| | | a fedora-list | | | | |---------+------------------------------> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | Para: fedora-list <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> | | cc: | | Asunto: Re: I think fedora needs... | >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 04:54, dballester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi: > > The really needs for Linux Desktop is an hipotetical program called > something like LUI ( Linux Universal Installer ). With apt-rpm we have a > good application manager but we need to make easy for end-users to 'click' > on a program.tar.gz and run configure, make, make install in a fake place, > resolving dependencies and working eith apt-rpm or standalone to > download/install/update this dependencies. That said, however, I would agree that some sort of universal GUI installer would make it easier for those migrating from closed-source platforms ...a prime example: Microsoft Windows (TM). OTH, I would imagine a script that would extract the tarred file, and running behind a gui. So in effect, instead of doing "tar-xvf {filename}.tgz" on the command line, the user would do this cheers, Elton Woo ;-) -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_4504.html "You only live once: let's make life BETTER for each other." LINUX User #193975 [AMD ATHLON CPU] ICQ #149608718.Public -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list