Re: I think fedora needs...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 05:31, dballester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> OF COURSE!. My be I explained bad. An example to make it more clear.
er, could you break your messages into paragraphs?
(¡sin parrafos, es *sumamente* dificil a leer!)


> configure claims that lib.something.0.34.so is missing and tk>=4.6 is
> needed ( some of this can be solved installing some app-devel packages and
IOW, the "dependency hell". That's where YUM, APT,or similiar would
come in handy. I would think that as up2date evolves, you would get
this versatility built-in, so you could install third party apps,
and the necessary dependencies would be pulled in as well.

Perhaps a bit of a dream, but if one can dream it, it can surely
be done. Alas, I am not a programmer, but someone would come up
with the proper tool or application that will do what you want!

Agreed?

cheers,

Elton ;-)
-- 
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_4504.html
"You only live once: let's make life BETTER for each other."
LINUX User #193975 [AMD ATHLON CPU] ICQ #149608718.Public





[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux