On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 09:23, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Dec 9, 2003, Hans MÃller <ndof@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > raid 10 when 1 disk in the raid1 and 1 disk in the raid0 part fail > > This claim doesn't make sense. There's no such thing as the raid1 > and raid0 parts. RAID 10 is a RAID 0 array built atop of a collection > of RAID 1 arrays. I always thought that RAID 10 was just a mirrored RAID 0 set. > > What you meant, and that part is correct, is that if you lose all > disks in the same RAID 1 set, the entire RAID10 array is toast. -- Michael Gargiullo <mgargiullo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Warp Drive Networks
