Am Montag 08 Dezember 2003 02:45 schrieb Xose Vazquez Perez: > Allan Metts wrote: > > This is an Adaptec AAA-133U2, apparently part of Adaptec's "Array 1000" > > family. > > > > --*-- Anyone see any issues with this controller and Fedora support? > > is it an aacraid board ? > > > --*-- It sounds like the general consensus is that, with five disks, I > > should use RAID 0/1 with a hot spare -- provided I can live without 60% > > of my disk space. If not, use RAID 5. Everyone agree? > > raid 10 or 01 = 1/2 of total storage > raid 5 = total_storage - 1_disk > > but raid 5 only supports a failure in *one* disk, and the rebuild of the > raid is _very_ slow. There is big degradation if one disk is broken. > Raid 10 can supports 2 failures in differents set of raid_1 and degradation > with 1 disk bad is less than raid5. > tht is not correct. when one disk in each arry fail the all data are lost. only 2 disk or more in the same arry can fail.
