Am Dienstag 09 Dezember 2003 02:22 schrieb Xose Vazquez Perez: > Hans Müller wrote: > >>but raid 5 only supports a failure in *one* disk, and the rebuild of the > >>raid is _very_ slow. There is big degradation if one disk is broken. > >>Raid 10 can supports 2 failures in differents set of raid_1 and > >> degradation with 1 disk bad is less than raid5. > > > > tht is not correct. when one disk in each arry fail the all data are > > lost. only 2 disk or more in the same arry can fail > > I don't know what you mean. > > RAID_5 - _only_ one disk can fail. > RAID_10 - it's two raid 1 joined by a stripe and can fail one disk in every > raid 1 set. raid 10 when 1 disk in the raid1 and 1 disk in the raid0 part fail then all data is lost. only one or more disk of the raid 0 OR of the raid 1 part can fail without any data lost. > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
