Hans Müller wrote:
>>but raid 5 only supports a failure in *one* disk, and the rebuild of the
>>raid is _very_ slow. There is big degradation if one disk is broken.
>>Raid 10 can supports 2 failures in differents set of raid_1 and degradation
>>with 1 disk bad is less than raid5.
> tht is not correct. when one disk in each arry fail the all data are lost.
> only 2 disk or more in the same arry can fail
I don't know what you mean.
RAID_5 - _only_ one disk can fail.
RAID_10 - it's two raid 1 joined by a stripe and can fail one disk in every
raid 1 set.
