--- William Hooper <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Alexander Dalloz said: > > Am Do, den 04.12.2003 schrieb Edward Muller um > 19:31: > >> This comes up every day (once or twice). If there > is a Fedora Core 1 > >> FAQ, this should be added. > >> > >> P.S. If there is a Fedora Core 1 FAQ I didn't > easily see it at > >> fedora.redhat.com > > I agree, a Fedora Core FAQ is desirable (more below). > > Yes, an official FAQ page on fedora.redhat.com > would be a nice thing I > > feel. Maybe just because users on this list don't > care for the list > > archive to search for answers but feel free to ask > questions and report > > problems which comes up at least twice a week. ;) > > > > Alexander > > If someone doesn't bother to even look at the > archives and see a problem > that comes up twice a week, what makes you think > they will read a FAQ? > Searching the archives sometimes requires a "just right" combination of key words to get useful results. Just earlier today, I was searching for problems unmounting movable media. I had to try several combinations of "unmounting, problems, removable, CDROM, and usbkey" before I finally got useful hits (and learned this was a known problem, and a reported bug). An FAQ is usually easier to scan visually, and brings together those often-reported problems. > For that matter, I don't think it is a Fedora issue, > it is a NVidia issue, > so it belongs in their FAQ. NVidia's closed source > drivers don't come > with Fedora, so why should Fedora have to support > them? > > -- > William Hooper > It is an nVidia problem, but its also a Fedora problem too. (At least to the person asking the question.) An FAQ might simply link to the approipriate nVidia FAQ. > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/
