Re: [PATCH] x86: Voluntary leave_mm before entering ACPI C3

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Aviod TLB flush IPIs during C3 states by voluntary leave_mm() before 
>>> entering C3.
>>>
>>> The performance impact of TLB flush on C3 should not be significant with 
>>> respect to C3 wakeup latency. Also, CPUs tend to flush TLB in hardware 
>>> while in C3 anyways.
>>>
>
> Are there any CPUs around which *don't* flush the TLB across C3?  (I 
> guess it's not guaranteed by the spec, though, and as TLBs grow larger 
> there might be incentive to keep them online.)

i dont think it's required for C3 to even turn off any portion of the 
CPU - if an interrupt arrives after the C3 sequence is initiated but 
just before dirty cachelines have been flushed then the CPU can just 
return without touching anything (such as the TLB) - right? So i dont 
think there's any implicit guarantee of TLB flushing (nor should there 
be), but in practice, a good C3 sequence would (statistically) turn off 
large portions of the CPU and hence the TLB as well.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/