* Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > cool! Please Cc: lkml and Harvey as well so that there's less
> > overlap in unification work - Harvey spent quite some time unifying
> > and cleaning up the kprobes code during the past week.
>
> Should I rewrite it based on current git tree?
> My patch includes 3 part of patches.
> - 2 Bugfix patches (which is not merged yet.)
> - 2 booster patches (ditto)
> - 2 unification patches (most of this patches are already done by Harvey's patch)
would it be easier/more robust to first did the unification patches and
then get the bugfixes and new features in? That would give us your
bugfixes and new features on both 32-bit and 64-bit at the same time.
feel free to do whichever approach you prefer - but it would be nice to
preserve the unification and cleanup work done by Harvey.
btw., is any of your bugfixes 2.6.24 material?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
