* Harvey Harrison <[email protected]> wrote:
> Further unification work. There is a possible behavior change on
> X86_32 here.
>
> is_IF_modifier(p->opcode)
>
> to
>
> is_IF_modifier(p->ainsn.insn)
>
> Which should be equivalent, but is not purely cosmetic as the rest of
> the unification so far.
hm, could you split this into two, the pure-equivalence and the
possibly-modifying patch? (that way any potential breakage becomes
bisectable) Same end result, just two commits instead of one.
also, did you manage to run/test kprobes (on 32-bit or 64-bit x86), and
it worked fine?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
