Re: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)

> We might want to add support for Netburst in 64bit mode some day. 
> For today, I simply exclude Netburst for x86_64.

If you switched to table driven then adding another format like 
this would be likely very easy. It's just that with the "own code for everything"
method it becomes difficult.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
    • From: "Metzger, Markus T" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
    • From: dean gaudet <[email protected]>
  • RE: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
    • From: "Metzger, Markus T" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
• Next by Date: RE: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
• Previous by thread: RE: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
• Next by thread: Re: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]