Re: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)

> We might want to add support for Netburst in 64bit mode some day. 
> For today, I simply exclude Netburst for x86_64.

If you switched to table driven then adding another format like 
this would be likely very easy. It's just that with the "own code for everything"
method it becomes difficult.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
  - From: "Metzger, Markus T" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
  - From: dean gaudet <[email protected]>
- RE: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
  - From: "Metzger, Markus T" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
Next by Date: RE: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
Previous by thread: RE: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
Next by thread: Re: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]