On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Jackson wrote: > A library such as libnuma can set them, yes, but not everyone uses > libnuma. Basically everyone uses the standard C library, glibc, which > has the system call wrappers, but these wrappers should not be setting > optional flags. > I think what would end up happening is that additional functions would be added to libnuma that would effect the system-wide nodemask numbering by simply OR'ing the MPOL_F_MODE_SYS_WIDE flag as part of the mode actual. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: check boundary in count/setup_resource called by get_current_resources
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Index(es):
 |