Christoph wrote:
> The library interface can set flags to modify behavior.
A library such as libnuma can set them, yes, but not everyone uses
libnuma. Basically everyone uses the standard C library, glibc, which
has the system call wrappers, but these wrappers should not be setting
optional flags.
We're going around in circles here, Christoph.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Lee Schermerhorn <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- References:
- [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children
- Next by Date: Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Index(es):
 |