Christoph wrote: > The library interface can set flags to modify behavior. A library such as libnuma can set them, yes, but not everyone uses libnuma. Basically everyone uses the standard C library, glibc, which has the system call wrappers, but these wrappers should not be setting optional flags. We're going around in circles here, Christoph. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- References:
- [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children
- Next by Date: Re: USB: FIx locks and urb->status in adutux
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
- Index(es):
![]() |